Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Chicken Is Dunked in Chlorine? Believe It.


Know Where Your Meat Comes From to Avoid Unwanted Chemicals
I was giving an eco-parenting talk last week when a pregnant-with-her-second-child mom asked me if it were true that all chicken is bathed in chlorine as part of its slaughterhouse processing. I was grossed out, appalled, and stumped. I wasn’t, however, surprised. Conventional meat is about as grim and questionable as it gets. The slaughterhouses must have some serious gunk in need of disinfecting, especially as it is done in (potentially cross contaminating) bulk. I haven’t personally used chlorine bleach in years and years and clearly would not want the food I feed my family to be dunked in it.

When I got home, I immediately started researching her query. I personally get chicken from three places: my local farmers market, a pastured meat and poultry CSA I belong to, and a butcher shop near my parents’ place in upstate New York called Fleisher's. I have never smelled anything even remotely chlorine-y about any of these birds. But apparently a lot of people have smelled the chemical on theirs.

My first mode of action was to email my CSA contact to find out what they do to “clean” poultry, and to see if they could help get me up to date on what USDA organic regulations are when it comes to chlorine (I highly doubted they permit such a caustic chemical). Then I started reading everything I could about chlorinated chickens. I had given the mom who asked my email address and she forwarded me some links. One article she sent from Britain’s Daily Mail lamenting a possible lift of a ban against US chicken pointed out that it “would have to be labeled as 'treated with antimicrobial substances' or 'decontaminated by chemicals'.” Would that we had such labels here!

My basic understanding is that most big poultry producers in the United States do put their chicken in chlorine baths to decontaminate it. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced earlier this year new policies and practices related to something called a Salmonella verification sampling program. It’s part of an overall initiative to raise performance standards among poultry and beef processing plants in testing and eliminating Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter and Listeria. To put this in a little context: chlorine baths are currently banned in the EU for meat and organic food in general, though apparently not for salad mixes. (Though of course it also sounds like rules and regulations change frequently. It’s hard to keep up on what is and isn’t permitted to be bathed in chlorine and, also, who, exactly is making sure what isn’t permitted isn’t happening.) In America, these baths are permitted for salad mixes, meat, and more.

Stateside, many organic and/or pastured poultry producers use ozone instead of chlorine. Apparently the USDA organic rules for chlorine levels in water must not exceed the maxim residual disinfectant limit under the Safe Drinking Water Act. By all accounts I read the levels used for chlorine baths are quite a bit higher than for regular old drinking water. In other words: chlorine baths like the ones conventional processing plants are using aren’t permitted for organic chicken. (Any meat wonks out there reading this please let me know by posting in comments if I’m getting this wrong!) Besides, I don’t personally know many organic farmers who would willingly use chlorine when there are other viable, safer disinfecting options like ozone.

That said I know not everyone “sources” (or can source) their chicken as intimately as I do, so I emailed the people at Murray’s Chicken to figure out what they do. Murray’s is the most natural, widely available brand where I live. I like the fact that they’ve recently phased out styrofoam trays in favor of more eco-friendly packaging. And, back in 2001, when I was writing about food for Details magazine, I decided it would be a good idea to see turkeys be slaughtered for a Thanksgiving column. I wound up going to see one of Murray’s Turkey farms. It was an eye opening experience and I was -- and am -- happy to report the conditions seemed quite ok, considering. I had expected the day would turn me into a vegetarian but mere hours after stroking a free range baby turkey in my arms, I ate some breast right there on the clean, gorgeous farm.

It turns out Murray’s uses electrolyzed “eco water” to clean their birds. A press release they sent me about the new-ish water says they’re the first poultry processor to use this technology in its food sanitation process on an industrial scale. More from the press release:


“Successful trials, including several at the University of Georgia, have shown that electrolyzed water is highly effective at killing food-borne bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli and Listeria, without affecting the quality of the food. '...We grow our chickens without administering any antibiotics, and our chickens are fed a 100% vegetarian feed free of any animal fats or animal by-products. EAU’s electrolyzed water is created using natural ingredients and has been proven non-toxic in addition to being effective,’ said Steve Gold, Vice President of Marketing for Murray’s Chicken. Electrolyzed water, marketed as Empowered Water(TM) by EAU, is created by combining salt and water with an electrical charge. The process separates the positive and negative ions of water, creating two forms of water, one very acidic and one very alkaline. The alkaline EO water is used to clean the chicken, followed by a rinse of the electrolyzed acidic water to kill any remaining food-borne pathogens.”


Yet another reason to know your farmers and/or butchers whenever possible. Or to spend the extra time to seek out trustworthy companies. Chlorine should not be what’s for dinner.



article from thedailygreen.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Air Travelers Avoided 41 Million Trips

According to the Travel Industry Association (TIA), deep frustration among air travelers caused them to avoid an estimated 41 million trips over the past 12 months at a cost of more than $26 billion to the U.S. economy.

The study, conducted by the polling firms of Peter D. Hart Research Associates and The Winston Group, demonstrated that air travelers express little optimism for positive change, with nearly 50 percent saying that the air travel system is not likely to improve in the near future.

Roger Dow, President and CEO of TIA, said "… more than 100,000 travelers each day are voting with their wallets by choosing to avoid trips."

Dow noted that the 41 million avoided trips during the last 12 months rippled outward across the entire travel community:

  • Costing airlines more than $9 billion in revenue
  • Hotels nearly $6 billion
  • Restaurants more than $3 billion
  • Federal, state and local governments lost more than $4 billion in tax revenue

Additional findings of the study:

  • 28% of air travelers avoided at least one trip over the past year (2.1 trips on average) due to the problems in the air travel process.
  • Over the past 12 months, approximately 112,000 trips were avoided per day; a total of 12 million business trips and 29 million leisure trips.
  • More than 60% believe the air travel system is deteriorating
  • 33% of all air travelers are dissatisfied with the air travel system, and 48% of frequent air travelers (5+ trips per year) are dissatisfied
  • 39% of all air travelers feel their time is not respected in the air travel process, and among frequent air travelers that number surges to 51%.
  • Nearly 50% of all air travelers do not think it is likely that the air travel system will be improved in the near future.

Travelers tend to appreciate the convenience and safety of air travel, but at least as many passengers say air travel is frustrating

Attitudes About Traveling By Air and Airport Experience

Attitude

All Travelers

3+ Trips/Year

5+ Trips/Year

Frustrating

40%

48%

52%

Convenient

40

37

32

Safe

32

29

30

Efficient

18

15

15

Unreliable

16

21

26

Relaxing

15

13

14

Infuriating

10

11

11

Broken

5

6

10

Source: Peter D. Hart Research & The Winston Group, May 2008

The statistical margin of sampling error is ± 3.2 percentage points

Allan Rivlin, a partner at Peter D. Hart Research Associates, said "…Inefficient security screening and flight cancellations and delays are air travelers' top frustrations."

For additional information about the study, please visit TIA here.

Monday, June 23, 2008

IBM, Nokia, Sony, Others to Share Their Green Patents


Jan. 14, 2008 IBM and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development are teaming with Nokia, Pitney Bowes, and Sony to release dozens of environmentally responsible patents into the public domain. The portfolio, called the "Eco-Patent Commons," aims to encourage researchers, entrepreneurs, and companies to develop greener products and services.

Patents pledged to Eco-Patent Commons feature innovations focused on environmental matters and innovations in manufacturing or business processes where the solution provides an environmental benefit. For example, Nokia submitted a patent on creating new electronics products such as clocks, calculators, and PDAs from old
cellphone components.

Any individual or company may pledge one or more patents, to be included in the Eco-Patent Commons at the organization's discretion.

Innovation to address environmental issues will require both the application of technology as well as new models for sharing intellectual property among companies in different industries, says Dr. John E. Kelly III, IBM senior vice president and director of IBM Research. In addition to enabling new players to engage in protecting the environment, the free exchange of valuable intellectual property will accelerate work on the next level of environmental challenges."

For more information visit the Eco-Patent Commons website, download this brochure (PDF).

To view a video highlighting some of the patented innovations IBM has pledged, click here.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

FEED 1 BAG

FEED 1 bag = 1 child fed in school for 1 year

The FEED 1 bag is a simple, well-designed burlap and 100% organic cotton bag that has a mighty mission - to help raise awareness and funds for child hunger.
Thanks to lots of incredible customer support, we have been able to FEED over 40,000 children for a year in school and counting!
Support FEED and the World Food Program's School Feeding operations in 74 countries by BUYING a FEED 1 BAG.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Freecycling

By Sally Deneen

Buzz up!

Let’s say you have a perfectly good fish tank or swing set or computer you no longer want, but it’s too much of a hassle to drag it to a thrift store – where it may be turned away, anyway.

A fun way to find new homes for stuff is posting your items at Freecycle.org, a grassroots, volunteer-driven Internet movement committed to the notion that one person's trash is another person's treasure. Think of it as an on-line message center that connects people who want to get rid of stuff with those who can use it. Members of the free web site can give and receive items for free.

It’s a "free cycle" of giving, which keeps good things out of landfills, reduces waste and saves resources. Begun in 2003 when Deron Beal sent out an e-mail announcing the Freecycle Network to about 30 or 40 friends and a handful of nonprofit organizations in Tucson, the Arizona-based nonprofit organization since has spread around the world. So far, there are more than 4,000 local Freecycle Network groups (reachable via Freecycle.org). Among rules: All items must be completely free with no strings attached. No illegal or adult-themed materials are allowed.

No item is too big or too small to post at Freecycle. Offerings have included comforters, beds, mattresses, a 10-year-old glider rocker that rocks smoothly but its arm joints are broken, a working dryer, clothing of all kinds, a satellite dish, Halloween costumes, jogging strollers, file cabinets, computer stuff, picture frames, vases, kids’ stuff, an avocado green refrigerator that must be picked up the next day, coupons for infant formula… You get the idea. Imagine if all of that ended up at the dump. The network estimates that it’s daily keeping more than 300 tons of stuff out of landfills.

If you’re in the market for an item, you can browse the listings or tell the community what you’re seeking. You never know what people have tucked in the attic. You sure can’t beat free!

article found on thedailygreen.com

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

BeGreen Store Home

Choose Wisely. It's a Small Planet

Looking for that perfect green product or gift? The BeGreen store stocks only the highest-quality carbon offset products and sustainable merchandise. And whats unique about us is that every product we sell supports green technologies like renewable energy, forest sequestration, and energy efficiency projects.

BeGreen Driver


BeGreen Home


BeGreen Traveler


Gift of Green


BeGreen Carbon Offsets

Featured products
Gift of Green - Cilantro Leaf Card
See details
Gift of Green - Cilantro Leaf Card

For each Gift of Green purchased, one native tree is planted in an ecosystem restoration project in the United States. An average tree will absorb more than 650 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) over its lifetime — that’s equal to the amount produced by driving about 740 miles. In addition to absorbing CO2, the new trees will also help restore forests damaged by natural disasters and return the forest to its former glory.

Friday, May 16, 2008

California Winemaker Thinks Outside the Bottle


Dec. 19, 2007 Five years after becoming one of the first U.S. vintners to package wine in lightweight, space-saving cartons instead of bottles, California winemaker Three Thieves has expanded its green-packaging program to include new varietals, citing significant savings in materials and shipping costs.
Since 2001, Three Thieves's Bandit-brand wines have been sold in packaging-pioneer Tetra Pak's "aseptic" cartons, which reduce the packaging waste associated with bottled wine by 90% and can be distributed, warehoused, and displayed in stores without refrigeration. Aseptic cartons also fit into delivery trucks more efficiently and weigh less than glass bottles, reducing carbon dioxide emissions and saving fuel.

The savings that we pass along to the consumer are significant, considering that there are no corks, labels, or foils used, and the cartons are a fraction of the weight and cost of glass, says company cofounder Charles Bieler.

Three Thieves is now offering Bandit merlot, cabernet sauvignon, chardonnay, and pinot grigio in Tetra Pak's 1-liter Tetra Prisma cartons, comprised of 70% paper, as well as single-serve 250 ml cartons.

article found on sustainablelifemedia.com